What to know about the case that could rein in Trump’s sweeping concept of presidential power — or endorse it.

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Wednesday on the legality of President Donald Trump’s sweeping “Liberation Day” tariffs, a landmark case that could upend the Trump administration’s signature economic policy, carry millions of dollars in ramifications for businesses and foreign countries and further expand Trump’s executive authority.

If the Supreme Court rules that President Trump's tariffs are illegal, officials may face the unprecedented task of refunding $90 billion in already collected revenue.

The Supreme Court’s questioning of the use of a 1977 emergency law to impose tariffs on scores of countries raised doubt about the centerpiece of the president’s economic agenda.

Landor v. Louisiana, one of this year’s highest-profile religious freedom cases, underscores how complex legal protections for free exercise are in the US today.

President Trump said he will develop a "Game 2 plan" to carry out his agenda in case the Supreme Court rules against his tariffs.

Lower courts have ruled that the president does not have the authority to impose sweeping taxes on imported goods, but the nation's highest court will have the final say.

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments Wednesday over President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs. Trump justified his import taxes under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

The Supreme Court late on Friday issued a temporary administrative stay on lower court orders that would have required the government to fully fund SNAP payments for the month of November.

The U.S. Supreme Court's chamber was buzzing on Wednesday, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick joining hundreds of others to hear arguments over the legality of President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs.