Under the CGST Act, executives responsible for company operations may face prosecution unless they prove due diligence.
Major updates include Supreme Court GST classification rulings, IBC jurisdiction clarifications, DTAA amendment with France, ...
The Tribunal quashed the attachment after verification showed only four items matched the alleged seller and no material established benami holding. The provisional attachment under PBPTA was held ...
Courts have questioned the practice of denying ITC by calling suppliers “non-existent” while simultaneously taxing outward supplies. The emerging judicial view protects bona fide buyers and rejects ...
Invoking powers under section 27 of the Act, the State Government introduced the 2026 Amendment Rules without prior publication. The revised provisions shift key filing and compliance dates to the ...
The Court directed the PCCIT to appoint a senior officer to re-examine a refund claim where both parties lacked decades-old records. A reasoned decision must be taken to ensure any legitimate refund ...
Courts have clarified that “reason to believe” under GST must rest on tangible material, not mere suspicion or template notices. Arbitrary cancellations, searches, and arrests without recorded reasons ...
The Tribunal upheld addition under Section 69 as the assessee failed to establish that the LIC investment belonged to the HUF. Mere assertion of agricultural income without documentary evidence was ...
Setting aside the assessment, the Court held that non-selection of a portal option cannot deprive an assessee of oral hearing. Denial of such opportunity amounted to violation of natural ...
ITAT Delhi held that interest awarded under Section 28 is an accretion to compensation and cannot be taxed as income from other sources. The appeal was allowed following Supreme Court ...
The Tribunal held that EIS paid to originators is not subject to TDS because the originator had not subscribed to PTCs and was not an investor. Since statutory conditions under Section 194LBC were not ...
NCLAT held that invoices with default dates beyond the Section 10A period cannot be barred under the COVID suspension provision. The ₹2.36 crore claim was restored for fresh ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results